CounselPro vs Claude

A Claude alternative that shows its work

Claude reads a statement well, and when you ask it for a total it tells you to check the figures against the originals. That advice is right. CounselPro is the checking: every sum computed with its inputs printed, every cycle balanced to the totals the bank printed, every row linked to the page it came off.

Family law · Bankruptcy · Fraud · Probate · Business litigation

Checked figureAlvarez · March to August 2025

Deposits other than payroll

$186,540.00

How it was reached
34 deposits, added in a calculator, with every input printed beside the result.
The account
Personal checking ····4188, held by M. Alvarez.
The cycles
Six statement cycles, each balanced to its own printed opening and closing totals.
The source
Every deposit links to the statement page it was read off, and the page opens beside it.

Two of the deposits, $9,400 and $9,600, landed three days apart in June. Flagged for review.

Every cycle balances

Opening, money in, money out, closing

Each statement cycle is measured against its own printed opening and closing totals, and the printed credit and debit counts are checked against what was read. A cycle that comes up short is read again against the page image until every figure matches what the bank printed.

A figure the records cannot support is left open and flagged for you, with the page beside it. Full reconciliation and self-healing run on the Premier plan and on every Single Project.

How reconciliation works
Personal checking ····4188 · May 2025Cycle 3 of 6
Opening balance, as printed$12,480.15
Money in, 41 rows$64,905.00
Money out, 96 rows$58,112.40
Running total$19,272.75
Ending balance on the statement$19,272.75
Off by$0.00

The arithmetic is computed rather than reasoned. Every sum, ratio and date calculation runs in a calculator and prints its inputs beside the result, so the figure can be taken apart by whoever reads it next.

A conversation, or a method

Method

The same steps, every statement, every matter

Asking a model

  • You paste in what fits, so the window decides how much of the production gets read at once.
  • The steps are whatever you thought to put in the prompt that day.
  • The total is reasoned inside the answer, alongside the writing.
  • The figure is quoted back to you, and finding it again in the production is your job.
  • Ask the same thing next week and the count can come back different.

Running a method

  • Every statement in the production is split out and read on its own, so the ninetieth reads like the first.
  • The same steps run on every statement, whoever on the team started the matter.
  • Every sum runs in a calculator that prints its inputs beside the result.
  • Every row keeps its statement page, and the page opens beside the figure.
  • The bank’s own printed totals settle the numbers, so the record decides them.

What you hand over

The schedule, the report, and the file behind them

A chat ends in a message. The figures are in the prose, the method was the prompt, and turning it into something you can file is an evening of retyping. CounselPro ends in the document: the schedule below, the long-form forensic report behind it, and the working files underneath both.

A schedule with its own caption

Each row carries the date, the source as the statement printed it, and the amount, under a caption that names the account and the period.

A forensic report written to the matter

A long-form report in twelve fixed sections, with the named analyses a support fight, a trustee’s lookback or a fraud claim turns on.

Files your team already opens

Every figure and every table exports as a spreadsheet, an image or a PDF, and every row keeps the page it came from.

See the forensic report

Exhibit 12

Deposits other than payroll

The Alvarez divorcePersonal checking ····4188March to August 2025
Deposits other than payroll into personal checking ····4188, March to August 2025
DateSource, as printedAmount
03-14-25Cash deposit · branch$4,200.00
05-02-25Zelle · Cordova Design Group$12,500.00
06-09-25Cash deposit · branch$9,400.00
06-12-25Cash deposit · branch$9,600.00
08-21-25Check #1184 · Ridgeline Contracting$18,750.00
Total34 deposits, March to August 2025$186,540.00
Each row links to the statement page it was read off.Every cycle balanced to its own printed opening and closing totals.

Confidentiality

What happens to a client’s records

Bank records in a support fight, a trustee’s lookback or a fraud claim belong to the client, and the duty follows them into whatever window you paste them into. ABA Formal Opinion 512 asks you to weigh where a client’s information goes before it goes there, and to get informed consent when the risk calls for it.

Where the file sits

Documents are encrypted on the way in and while they sit with us, and the infrastructure underneath is checked by outside auditors.

What we do with it

The records are read to run your matter, and they stay yours. No client document, figure or export trains a model, ours or a vendor’s, and the agreements we sign say so.

What a consumer plan asks of you

On Claude’s consumer plans you choose whether your conversations are used to improve the model, and a conversation you allow is kept for up to five years. Claude for Work and the API are governed separately. A privileged file should not rest on which way a setting was left.

How the data is held

Feature by feature

The same records, two tools

Claude is a product of Anthropic PBC. Its plans, pricing and data settings here are from Anthropic's own published terms.

CounselPro and Claude, capability by capability
CapabilityCounselPro$499 a matter, or from $100 a monthClaudeA general assistant, from $20 a month
Reading the records
Bank and credit card statements, scans includedIncludedIncluded
A whole production, split into statement cyclesEvery statement read on its ownWhat you paste into the conversation
Check images kept as their own recordIncludedRead in the chat with everything else
Investment and retirement statementsQ4 2026Reads the PDF
Checking the numbers
Every cycle balanced to its printed totalsIncludedNot included
How a sum is worked outComputed in a calculator, inputs printedReasoned inside the answer
What sets the stepsThe same method on every statementThe prompt you write
A figure the records cannot supportLeft open and flagged for youAnswered with a caveat to check it
Standing behind a figure
Every row keeps its statement pageIncludedQuoted in the reply
Open the source page beside the figureIncludedNot included
A schedule and a report you can fileIncludedProse you format yourself
What the case lives inA workspace the whole team opensA conversation
The analysis
Plain-English questions about the recordsIncludedIncluded
Flow of funds drawn, and exported as a fileIncludedDescribed in the answer
Hidden assets, structuring, income diversion, lifestyleNamed sections of the reportWhatever you think to ask for
Drafting, research and general legal writingFinancial records onlyIncluded
Confidentiality
What happens to the documents you sendRead to run your matter, never used to train a modelConsumer plans ask you to choose, and a conversation you allow is kept up to five years
Infrastructure checked by outside auditorsIncludedIncluded

CounselPro vs Claude questions, answered

What attorneys weighing the two ask first

Can Claude analyze bank statements?
It can read one. Give Claude a statement and it will pull the transactions out and reason about them, and on a single month it does that well. What it does not do is the work around the reading: measuring the cycle against the totals the bank printed, computing each sum in a calculator with the inputs shown, and keeping a link from every row back to the page it came off. That is the difference between an answer and a figure you can stand behind.
Is it safe to put client bank records into a general AI chatbot?
That is your call to make under ABA Formal Opinion 512, which asks you to weigh where a client’s information goes before it goes there, and to get informed consent when the risk calls for it. Two things are worth knowing first. On Claude’s consumer plans you choose whether your conversations are used to improve the model, and a conversation you allow is kept for up to five years; Claude for Work and the API are governed separately. With CounselPro the question does not arise: documents are encrypted, the infrastructure is independently audited, and no client record trains a model.
Why do two AI runs of the same statements give different totals?
A chat answer is generated fresh each time, so the same question can come back with a different count. CounselPro pins the numbers to the record instead. Every statement cycle is balanced to its own printed opening and closing totals, every sum is computed in a calculator that prints its inputs, and a figure the records cannot support is left open and flagged for you. The bank’s own totals decide the answer, so it is the same on Monday and on Thursday.
How does CounselPro check its own numbers?
Every statement cycle is balanced to its own printed beginning and ending totals, and the printed credit and debit counts are checked against what was read. A cycle that comes up short is read again against the page image until every figure matches what the bank printed. Anything the records cannot support is left open and flagged for you, with the page beside it. Full reconciliation and self-healing run on the Premier plan and on every Single Project.
When is Claude the better choice?
Whenever the work is writing and thinking rather than arithmetic. Drafting a motion, summarizing a deposition, working through an argument, reading one statement to get your bearings: Claude is very good at all of it, and CounselPro does none of it. Reach for CounselPro when a number has to survive the other side reading it.

Ask it what you already know

Take a matter you have closed, where you know what the money did, and put the same question to CounselPro. Every figure it hands back opens the page it was read off, so checking the answer takes minutes.

Your first matter, free